Already a member?

Sign In

iBlog

IASSIST '08 Followup, Part 2: Restricted Data

Regardless of the institutional setting in which we work, more and more of us are having to address researcher access to restricted or confidential datasets.  This post focuses on sessions at Stanford that covered this important topic--or rather, group of topics because there are so many intersecting responsibilities to actually making such access a reality for our users.

Lisa Neider's poster session focused on the practicalities of "Administering Restricted Data Contracts."  In particular, her handout provided "natural language" tips when working with the agreements required by data distributors.

I also attended Friday's paper session, "Licensing, Privacy, and Protection. " Many of us now interact with Institutional Review Boards (IRB) in our respective institutions.  It's not easy to balance the needs of researchers, expectations of the IRBs, and requirements of data collectors and distributors.  Summaries of the presentations follow. Admittedly, they focus on the things that I found interesting--so do comment on the points I've missed!

Amy Pienta (ICPSR) was unable to present in person, but session chair Libbie Stephenson discussed the high points and forwarded Amy's excellent handouts.  They review the many (many) issues involved with data deposit and retention, ownership and distribution rights, and respondent protection.  Although the paper focused on retention and archiving, the more memorable elements covered information loss. A couple chilling scenarios suffice.  An estimated 20% of data collected with NIH funding are never archived.  Significant amounts of data are discarded due to retention (or rather, nonretention policies) or misinterpretation of institutional or publication guidelines.  In particular, limited retention guidelines (such as those of APA) appear to give researchers a green light to dump their data. 

Thomas Lindsay (University of Minnesota) started with an historical overview on evolution of IRBs in the United States.  Review panels are largely populated by senior researchers. Although they bring substantial research experience to the table, their perspectives regarding security measures (the "locked file cabinet" approach) reflect traditional methodologies that don't translate completely to the digital age.  The result of IRB deliberations is, too often, inconsistent application of guidelines.  Such case-by-case review can inadvertently feed investigator disillusionment with the IRB process.  Data professionals can play an important intermediary role between researchers and panels charged with protecting the rights of research participants. 

Libbie Stephenson (UCLA) discussed institutional review processes from the perspective of a service that supports public-use data products.  Based on interactions with a variety of players (data users, researchers seeking funding, IRB members, university legal counsel staff, and others), she's compiled an excellent resource, Guidelines for Data Sharing and Access.  See the link from here:  http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/issr/da/resource.htm

Pam Baxter IASSIST U.S. Region Secretary

Comments

Great notes, Pam, thanks. Too

Great notes, Pam, thanks. Too bad more of us didn't do this for the conference and blog. The link to Libbie's site at the end looks very useful for us. I just wanted to say that Oliver Watteler's workshop on Confidentiality for Beginners was quite useful too, https://www.stanford.edu/group/ADS/cgi-bin/drupal/confidentiality-beginners .

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
  • IASSIST Quarterly

    Publications Special issue: A pioneer data librarian
    Welcome to the special volume of the IASSIST Quarterly (IQ (37):1-4, 2013). This special issue started as exchange of ideas between Libbie Stephenson and Margaret Adams to collect

    more...

  • Resources

    Resources

    A space for IASSIST members to share professional resources useful to them in their daily work. Also the IASSIST Jobs Repository for an archive of data-related position descriptions. more...

  • community

    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter

    Find out what IASSISTers are doing in the field and explore other avenues of presentation, communication and discussion via social networking and related online social spaces. more...